|Requestor Title||name for the request, i.e., Social Sciences Instructor 1.0|
|Requestor||name of the requestor|
|Program, Unit, or Department||the program, unit or department, submitting the PBC request|
|Request Code||Select the Request Code from the list of codes and enter the amount from no. 6 in the corresponding code line in the “Amount” column|
|Item Amount||this amount is the estimated dollar amount of the PBC request; the request amount should be listed in the category line which corresponds to the request code as defined in the “PBC Form Definitions”|
|Total Amount||total of one or more codes|
|Overall Rubric Rating||Select a “priority” based on the “overall rating” from Part C. PBC Form Priority Rubric Rating from page 2 of the PBC form; priority 1, 2 or 3, is the total points of the rubric; place an “X” in the corresponding priority column on page 1; the overall rubric rating is based on the documentation from factors 1-6 presented in Part B. Documentation|
|Descriptive Summary of the Request||Provide a concise summary of the PBC request|
|Factor 1–6||For items 9-14, the PBC request documentation should show how it is: 1) aligned with system priorities and performance funding; 2) alignment with College Strategic Plan, goals, and performance funding; 3) alignment with analysis of GE, program, course SLOs assessment data and/or process outcomes (for non-instructional units); 4) alignment with immediacy and/or a critical need to fill; 5) alignment with health and safety; 6) alignment with level of impact and targeted populations impacted; (indicate the alignment by citing the appropriate sections of the Strategic Plan, SLOs or process outcome document, etc., and other pertinent items)|
|Total Points||Tally the total number of points from columns 1, 2, and 3; use this point value to select priority 1, 2, or 3 )no. 7) and place an “X” in the corresponding priority column on page 1.|
|Rationale for Request||Describe how the PBC request will benefit the program, unit, department, institution or targeted population; the factors from the “Planning and Budget Rubric” used to determine the priority should be addressed here.|
|Item||List the item(s) for the “Itemized Resource Request”|
|Item Amount||list the amount of each item for the “Itemized Resource Request”|
Operating Equipment: Equipment required to perform function of existing programs, not new program. (e. g., scales, microscopes); usually funded through annual equipment allocations.
Operating Other: Other current expenditures required to perform function for existing programs, not new program. (e.g., educational supplies, software, non-equipment & non-personnel); usually funded through internal reallocation, (e. g., enrollment SSH formula based).
Program Change Request: PCR = All costs related to a new program being requested (e. g., personnel, supplies, equipment, as for the Vet Tech Program last year).
PCR – Workload: Substantial (PCR) request for additional funding for an existing program to meet increase in workload, otherwise funded through internal reallocation, enrollment SSH formula based.
PCR – New Facilities: Request for new facility related needs. (e.g., electricity, janitorial, and maintenance positions for Library building)
CIP – New Facility: Capital Improvement Project (CIP), e.g., Library Learning Commons Building.
CIP – Renovation: Minor CIP funds allocated to address major renovation projects (e.g. Manaopono, Noeau/Laakea, Naauao renovations).
CIP – R&M (Repairs and Maintenance): CIP funds allocated to the system to address repairs and maintenance projects on campus that cannot be funded through regular campus operating funds (too costly).
Use the following to help determine the point value for the factors in the “Priority Rubric Rating” (page 2).
Expected: direct and clear alignment and application to stated system priorities and system performance criteria
Expected: direct and clear alignment and application to stated College, SP, goals and performance funding criteria
Expected: assessment analysis shows clear and direct application of assessment criteria
Expected: >40 credits existing lecturer load of enrolled coursework over several years with long-term foreseeable need
Non-Instructional Faculty and APT
Expected: grant-funded or casual hire position similar to requested position over several years with long-term foreseeable need
Expected: College overall health and safety are enhanced or improved by request
Expected: Request will significantly impact and improve College structure, function and attainment of stated goals